Fujitsu CELSIUS R570

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS R570  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2628-B1
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110818
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 16:45
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 153
55% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 486
47% 386 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 848E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.46 fps
MRender 2.67
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.83
1% 1.79 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
ATI Radeon HD 2400-XT
Dell(1028 0D02) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.78 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 121 113 109 97 109 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.6% Above average
Read 243
Write 234
Mixed 197
SusWrite 111
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 31.2
103% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 114%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
117GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 88 95 89 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 230
Write 208
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 89.3
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 10.7
42% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 32.1
DQ Write 18.7
DQ Mixed 19.3
16% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 56%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 176 177 173 174 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 174
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 175
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.5
274% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Tp02000g B 2TB
393GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 37 38 37 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 64.8
Write 68.2
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 37.6
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 97%
Generic- SD/MMC 128GB
14GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 17 13 15 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
8.24% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 13.7
Mixed 14.8
SusWrite 14.4
20% 15.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
59% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.24%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.4% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 20.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS R570 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R570

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $537
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback