| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M H (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| OS | Windows 8 |
| BIOS Date | 20180614 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 20 '19 at 04:12 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | ECU-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.7%
Good
|
68% 125 Pts
|
50% 373 Pts
|
20% 317 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
2.01%
Terrible
|
2% 2.09 fps
|
3% 3.43 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 92 84 77 22 51 MB/s
|
43.7%
Average
|
52% 71.6 MB/s
|
101% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
262GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 32 33 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
31% 41.7 MB/s
|
77% 0.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
V02D4L84GB5285282400 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
31.6%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
23% 8.2 GB/s
|
36% 112 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,718 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 388x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 375x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 290x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 192x |
| UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)IntelBench 5%, 32,403 samples | 127x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 122x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $218 |