Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	23.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 216 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 520 53% 431 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB 17,192 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 203 184 15 11 58 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	23.3% Poor	Read 211 Write 201 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 112 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 0.9 27% 8.47 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 12.2 DQ Mixed 0.8 5% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 101%
Generic USB SD Reader 32GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 21GB free, PID 6200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.8 4.4 4.8 4.9 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.25% Terrible	Read 17.8 Write 2 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.5 7% 7.12 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.25% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB 1,718 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	279x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	77x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	45x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $276

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16