Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '19 at 15:08
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 71.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 828 76% 636 Pts	64-Core 1,234 76% 1,234 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.4% Average	Lighting 58.8 Reflection 64.9 Parallax 78.9 48% 67.5 fps	MRender 64.7 Gravity 51.6 Splatting 54.5 46% 56.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR1TB-D8 1TB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 70 435 84 13 1.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 501 Write 429 Mixed 412 SusWrite 101 81% 361 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 13.7 4K Mixed 0.9 49% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 16.1 DQ Mixed 1.1 25% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 105%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB 9,045 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 551GB free Firmware: 05.04C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 40 40 40 39 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 60.3 Write 52.5 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 39.7 35% 47.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 49%
WDC WD10 EURX-63FH1Y0 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 88GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.2% Very poor	Read 37.6 Write 34.9 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 4.3 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 132% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 36%
WDC WD20 EADS-00W4B0 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 968GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 30.9 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 0.1 30% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 13%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 382GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0.1 0.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.01% Terrible	Read 37.4 Write 36.8 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 0.2 34% 26.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.01% Great: 59%
ST315003 41AS 1.5TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1.5TB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 34 34 35 35 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 37.9 Write 38.4 Mixed 27.3 SusWrite 33.9 46% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 43%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,232 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 141 142 142 134 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	72.2% Very good	Read 96.6 Write 96.6 Mixed 77.8 SusWrite 138 142% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 9.1 4K Mixed 0.7 335% 3.43 MB/s	DQ Read 0.3 DQ Write 8.9 DQ Mixed 0.9 334% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 76%
ST375052 5AS 750GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 237GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 124 124 125 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 111 Write 124 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 124 149% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 49%
ST350041 8AS 500GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 465GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 124 124 125 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 130 Write 132 Mixed 74.3 SusWrite 124 154% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB 1,843 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.7% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 27.2 MC Mixed 25.6 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 24.2 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 97.1 41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,439x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	307x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	283x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	235x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	232x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $152Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	178x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	203x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	143x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $791

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)