Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 15 '19 at 12:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 426
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8334) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.97% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.97%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 92 96 90 94 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 400
Write 140
Mixed 187
SusWrite 94.3
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 38.1
151% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 130
106% 152 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75%
Great: 82%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
340GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 572 576 577 580 578 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 733
Write 584
Mixed 626
SusWrite 577
142% 630 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 79.7
258% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 787
DQ Write 627
DQ Mixed 1,122
727% 845 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 177%
Great: 355%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 750GB
500GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 105 108 109 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 62.5
Write 82
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 107
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
193% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 66%
SAMSUNG HM640JJ 640GB
69GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 87 83 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 54.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 85.1
90% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $256Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback