HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateAug 29 '19 at 16:30
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G840-$45
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 55.3
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 54
32% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 68.3
8-Core 75.5
9% 71.9 Pts
64-Core 65.3
4% 65.3 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 1308 MHz, MLim: 486 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 5.19
4% 5.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 7.7
5% 5.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 105 123 141 130 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 122
Write 117
Mixed 48.3
SusWrite 127
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 69 74 72 82 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 112
Write 121
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 73.1
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 70%
USB3.0 160GB
37GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 24.3
Write 13
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 19.3
14% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 55%
USB 160GB
108GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 18.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 19.1
15% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 33%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
27GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 8.2 15 20 18 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 26.9
Write 11.2
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 14.7
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 2.5
247% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
8GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.5 5.1 4.6 5.3 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 4.9
8% 7.65 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0
38% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.M16F Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 7
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback