TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B450M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B84
MotherboardMSI B450M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84)  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190902
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 26 '19 at 22:03
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 73.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 214
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 449
60% 448 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 75.4%
 Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Sapphire(174B A003)
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 51.7
0% 27.3 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 37.3
29% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 10%
 Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 192 197 197 195 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 465
Mixed 291
SusWrite 199
81% 364 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 48.4
168% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 248
192% 262 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 96.2%
 Great: 104%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
862GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 143 144 145 145 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 138
Write 146
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 142
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 80.5%
 Great: 75%
ST910082 2A 100GB
65GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.92% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 8
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 26.8
22% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 9.92%
 Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 28.5
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 94
42% 94 ns
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 85.5%
 Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B450M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84) Builds (Compare 933 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B450M PRO-M2 (MS-7B84) - $80

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples288x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD  $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples84x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD  $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples72x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples113x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples66x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples57x
SSD
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GBBench 78%, 11,560 samples32x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples31x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples28x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples54x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples45x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples45x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $403
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback