MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 18:38
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 305
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 754
80% 636 Pts
64-Core 814
50% 814 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 63.2
60% 70 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 71
57% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1521 1620 2007 1869 1784 1853 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 314
Mixed 218
SusWrite 1,776
142% 615 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 46.8
256% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 836
DQ Write 736
DQ Mixed 811
601% 794 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 224%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
455GB free
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 235 121 252 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Read 318
Write 323
Mixed 262
SusWrite 163
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 17.9
67% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 230
206% 312 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 126%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
314GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 116 117 117 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 116
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70
221GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 52.2
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 94.5
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 63%
Generic USB SD Reader 8GB
4GB free, PID 0330
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 16 20 16 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 19
Write 13.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 19
17% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.9
122% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 2,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $938
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback