Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory48.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 153
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 501
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.2.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 67.2
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 90.3
55% 65.9 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 74
54% 64.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,657
Write 25.7
Mixed 44
189% 909 MB/s
4K Read 316
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 4
485% 107 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Corsair Force LS 60GB-$57
18GB free
Firmware: S9FM02.6
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 377
Write 60.5
Mixed 61.8
35% 166 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 9.3
68% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 18.2
DQ Mixed 4.7
20% 47.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 89%
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160
116GB free
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,543
Write 1,291
Mixed 1,207
300% 1,347 MB/s
4K Read 70.1
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 68
223% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 475
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 437
331% 445 MB/s
Poor: 302% Great: 559%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
80GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 316
Write 214
Mixed 206
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 22.1
92% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 170
156% 242 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
152GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,891
Write 56.2
Mixed 110
212% 1,019 MB/s
4K Read 400
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 6.7
616% 137 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 126%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,040
Write 56.5
Mixed 111
223% 1,069 MB/s
4K Read 380
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 7.2
586% 130 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 291%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
387GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1,112
Write 3.7
Mixed 6
267% 374 MB/s
4K Read 170
4K Write 0.2
10,624% 85 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 37.8
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 486 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback