PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Empty empty (all builds) |
Motherboard | TYAN S7012 |
Memory | 71.2 GB free of 80 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110923 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '19 at 13:21 |
Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
79%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$120
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
490GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 188 186 190 190 MB/s
|
41.5%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
224GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 162 144 101 190 190 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Lacie 2Big Quadra v3 10TB
2TB free
Firmware: 051E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung D3 Station 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 6124
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung S2 Portable 1TB
930GB free, PID 1f0a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Passport 2TB
2TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 1 1 1 1 MB/s
|
1.6%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 38x |
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples | 26x |
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 51x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 34x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |