PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7758 |
Motherboard | MSI B75A-G43 (MS-7758) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131031 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 21 '20 at 20:15 |
Run Duration | 193 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
|
64.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
PNY(196E 1350) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
58.7%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 132 130 126 133 128 MB/s
|
94%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
77GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 208 196 204 217 226 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung HM641JI 640GB-$50
76GB free
Firmware: 2AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 47 48 48 48 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 500GB (2012)
284GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 19 66 31 18 58 MB/s
|
17%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$21
145GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 100 103 106 105 MB/s
|
59.7%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 500GB
268GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 41 42 42 MB/s
|
20.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 87x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 79x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 29x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 26x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $227 |