Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100525
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 141
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 367
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 431.36
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.65% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 4.16
4% 4.22 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.65%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 15 76 75 61 5.5 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.8% Very poor
Read 201
Write 63.8
Mixed 28
SusWrite 43.6
18% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 2.8
32% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 7.2
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 3.2
4% 6.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 89%
JMicron 1.5TB
215GB free, PID 2561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 70 70 70 72 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.7% Below average
Read 90.5
Write 81
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 70.6
100% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
118% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%
JMicron 2TB
659GB free, PID 2561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.8 9.8 11 9.5 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 82
Write 84.8
Mixed 48
SusWrite 10
71% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 15.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback