Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	87.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '17 at 03:06
Run Duration	1490 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 142 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 429 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.4% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 134 Parallax 131 86% 124 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 120 Splatting 105 89% 109 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4746 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 252 (B1) Unknown 99 99 13 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 54 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11603811178	88.3% Excellent	Read 504 Write 390 Mixed 412 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 35 125% 40.8 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 91.5 DQ Mixed 63 65% 108 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 134%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB 3,103 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 79GB free Firmware: 21.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 176 5983 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6569 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 23041 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2290 (C2) HDA temperature 116 1 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.3% Below average	Read 52.3 Write 52.8 Mixed 53.4 40% 52.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.34 97% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 36%
Seagate ST3160828AS 160GB 887 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 59GB free Firmware: 8.04 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 57 39 210411985 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4202 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 491677973 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27333 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2542 (C2) HDA temperature 30 47 38654705694 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 39 210411985 (C5) Current pending sector count 130 100 4294967295 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 130 100 4294967295 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	22.5% Poor	Read 45.4 Write 32.7 Mixed 38.2 29% 38.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.35 86% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 32%
WD WD1200BEVS-60UST0 120GB 3,683 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 48GB free Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 198 194 2469 (03) Spinup time 161 161 2925 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5265 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 1 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6321 (0A) Spinup retry count 98 87 5 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3728 (C0) Power-off retract count 196 196 3705 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 159 159 125754 (C2) HDA temperature 121 79 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	18.9% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 32.6 Mixed 31.7 24% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.32 74% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 29%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID 1110 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	0.99% Terrible	Read 0.91 Write 0.67 Mixed 0.76 1% 0.78 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.21 4K Mixed 0.06 10% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 0.99% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 CMD16GX3M2A1866C10 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.2% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 12.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16