Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B250M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161125
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Mar 13 '20 at 18:42
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 224 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 683 65% 540 Pts	64-Core 685 42% 685 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$389 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 147 Parallax 157 124% 152 fps	MRender 176 Gravity 135 Splatting 98 107% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,665 Write 1,437 Mixed 788 287% 1,297 MB/s	4K Read 38.3 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 59.8 198% 72.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,185 DQ Write 957 DQ Mixed 800 673% 981 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 129GB free Firmware: MU01.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 118 61 61 62 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 475 Write 415 Mixed 380 SusWrite 126 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 43.5 152% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 236 196% 281 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 95%
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110 4,081 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 134GB free Firmware: S8FM05.8 SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 354 368 383 222 192 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 480 Write 256 Mixed 242 SusWrite 316 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 21.9 106% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 70.7 85% 144 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 91%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 438GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 71 72 72 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 87 Write 84.5 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 71.3 56% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 83%
WD WD30EZRX-00MMMB0 1TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 248GB free Firmware: CC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 132 138 133 134 135 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 131 Write 103 Mixed 85 SusWrite 133 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 83%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 682GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 36 37 36 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 35.5 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 36 45% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 44%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00A7B0 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 210GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 34 Write 35.2 Mixed 29 SusWrite 34.8 46% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 46%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 479GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.6 4.9 4.6 4.5 4.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 37.5 Mixed 33 SusWrite 4.6 36% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GVR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GVR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GVR 04CD F4-2400C15-8GVR 32GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 22.8 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 22.5 61% 21.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B250M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250M-D3H - $85

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $92Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	498x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	489x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	438x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	321x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	300x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	248x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	86x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	77x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	46x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	65x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	40x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16