Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R920 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3118-A1
Memory	121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120906
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '17 at 22:26
Run Duration	617 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 741 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 54.9 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 169 57% 103 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 632 57% 480 Pts	64-Core 1,614 100% 1,614 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Palit(1569 1004) 3GB CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	46.8% Average	Lighting 57.9 Reflection 52.6 Parallax 74.8 47% 61.8 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 50.3 Splatting 51 46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$89 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 834GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 12 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 64 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 3 (F1) Unknown 99 99 377671409	81.2% Excellent	Read 504 Write 397 Mixed 410 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 69.9 4K Mixed 19.4 107% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 205 DQ Mixed 16.8 43% 84.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 315GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7121 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 88 (B1) Unknown 98 98 34 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 49 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 18 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33837264726	88% Excellent	Read 512 Write 403 Mixed 420 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 37.7 131% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 69.2 DQ Mixed 17.3 22% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 134%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB 1,735 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 126 Write 128 Mixed 136 169% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.91 4K Write 2.44 4K Mixed 0.3 96% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 66%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 215GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 90.8 Write 94.2 Mixed 90.3 119% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.27 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 52%
ZOOM H1 SD R&W 2GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 1% 1GB free, PID null, Zoom H1 Handy Recorder Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.11% Terrible	Read 2.43 Write 1.95 Mixed 1.88 3% 2.09 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.006 5% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.11% Great: 2%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	86.3% Excellent	MC Read 38.6 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 31.7 102% 35.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.5 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R920 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R920

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	9x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	5x
MX300 275GBCrucial $100Bench 79%, 67,541 samples	2x
Trion 150 480GBOCZ $300Bench 85%, 13,412 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351U7CFR8A 16x4GBHynixBench 84%, 5 samples	4x
HMT351U7CFR8A 8x4GBHynixBench 85%, 11 samples	2x
36KSF1G72PZ-1 8x8GBMicronBench 89%, 49 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16