Huanan X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardHuanan X79  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '17 at 03:00
Run Duration608 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 159
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 610
55% 464 Pts
64-Core 809
50% 809 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 25.5
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 31.2
21% 29.3 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 34
25% 29.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 471
Write 253
Mixed 128
62% 284 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 10.6
67% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 23.3
66% 145 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
920GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 99.7
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.28
114% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 96%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
967GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 146
Write 86.6
Mixed 56.2
109% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.22
74% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
642GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 164
Write 182
Mixed 10.6
139% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.17
66% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 70%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
17GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 93.8
Write 97.5
Mixed 13.9
80% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.22
67% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 76%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
15GB free, PID 0743
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Read 22.6
Write 4.24
Mixed 7.02
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.09
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.12
20% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 31%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
15GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 4.85
Mixed 5.71
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- 36JSF51272PZ- 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 35
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 30.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Huanan X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $147
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback