Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 21:01
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 582
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 098F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.34% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 2.72
3% 3.66 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 3.57
4% 4.31 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.34%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
791GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X35510RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 333 263 233 226 226 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 437
Mixed 314
SusWrite 268
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 40.2
152% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 187
156% 226 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94%
Great: 107%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
463GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 119 118 120 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 124
Write 130
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 122
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.3
317% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 114%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 8TB
408GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 249 218 245 250 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 237
Mixed 18.1
SusWrite 239
132% 184 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.4
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $670
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback