Asrock X79 Extreme6

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X79 Extreme6 (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140416
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '17 at 22:10
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.8% Excellent	Memory 93.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 231 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 720 73% 592 Pts	64-Core 809 50% 809 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 376.62 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 14 Parallax 18.9 13% 16.2 fps	MRender 20.7 Gravity 18.6 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 319GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15117 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 426 (B1) Unknown 99 99 44 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 333 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18893222608	58.2% Above average	Read 210 Write 248 Mixed 208 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 32.2 96% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 6 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 5.52 30% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 64GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 109 25830939 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 -123729417836022 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 912 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 909 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 25830939 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 25830939 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 25830939 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16110 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6479 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6479 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6371	54.2% Above average	Read 495 Write 140 Mixed 108 53% 247 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 15.9 86% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1.86 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 0.54 3% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 82%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 488GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 164 6633 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3192 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 26020 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 965 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 844 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 135 135 195619 (C2) HDA temperature 124 114 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.6% Above average	Read 112 Write 77.8 Mixed 111 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.22 93% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 67%
Toshiba StorE HDD 1TB 259 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 224GB free, PID 0b15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 34.9 Write 30.6 Mixed 32.5 42% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.33 73% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A16 CMZ16GX3M2A16 CMZ8GX3M1A160 CMZ8GX3M1A160 32GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 38.7 MC Mixed 35.1 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.3 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme6 - $341

CPU
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	65x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	59x
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	8x

RAM
F3 DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 514 samples	10x
F3 DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 42%, 1,467 samples	8x
F3 DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 81%, 208 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $725

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16