Dell Precision T1700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Precision T1700
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1700 (all builds)
Memory	14.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141219
Uptime	5.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '17 at 08:21
Run Duration	712 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 189 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 362 49% 365 Pts	64-Core 356 22% 356 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W4100 Graphics Adapter 379 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Dell(1028 2B1E) 2GB CLim: 630 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	7.18% Terrible	Lighting 8.1 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 10.4 7% 9.7 fps	MRender 9.43 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 12.8 8% 9.78 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.18% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 0909 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 26.3 Mixed 26.2 20% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.25 88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 104%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0742GN64ZE 1TB 609GB free Firmware: GKAOA90A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 151 (03) Spinup time 111 111 55871996586 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 11927 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 31 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 32016 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2124 (C0) Power-off retract count 86 86 17782 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 17782 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 279173791781 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4	45.8% Average	Read 80.3 Write 79 Mixed 73.8 58% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.34 104% 0.95 MB/s

Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 99 6986784 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1307 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 400204478 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 9023 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1298 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 4295032838 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 52 672464936 (C2) HDA temperature 40 48 73014444072 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 36 6986784 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 127521873994544 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1370778122 (F2) Unknown 100 253 240277859	53.1% Above average	Read 99.1 Write 86 Mixed 74.3 65% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.01 4K Mixed 0.55 102% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 88%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 29.9 Write 24.5 Mixed 20 30% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.24 62% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 22%
Samsung STORY Station 1.5TB 903 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1TB free, PID 5f06 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 27.9 Write 23.5 Mixed 26.3 33% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.27 56% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 20%
WD 15EARS External 1.5TB 277 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 559GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 27.1 Write 23.1 Mixed 13.5 26% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.19 62% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 21%
LaCie Hard Drive 500GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 324GB free, PID 1016 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 27.2 Write 23.2 Mixed 24.6 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.36 74% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 21%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 500GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 296GB free, PID 7410 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 28.4 Write 25.6 Mixed 26.8 34% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.41 68% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 20%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 288GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 26.7 Write 22.9 Mixed 25.3 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.38 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 19%
Samsung S2 Portable 250GB 297 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 213GB free, PID 1f02 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 25.6 Mixed 26.4 34% 26.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.39 84% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 21%
ICSI IC1210 CF 4GB 4GB free, PID 2026 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.42% Terrible	Read 7.35 Write 7.55 Mixed 7.33 10% 7.41 MB/s	4K Read 2.38 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.04 12% 0.82 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-138.A00LF Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 9965525-138.A00LF Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 24GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.8 MC Mixed 18 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T1700 Builds (Compare 2,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1700

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	564x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	340x
Xeon E3-1241 v3Intel $209Bench 75%, 3,580 samples	229x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	249x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	168x
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples	159x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	72x
LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 4,915 samples	56x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	54x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	78x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 3,905 samples	48x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 7,869 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16