Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190807
Uptime	10.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '20 at 16:08
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$294 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	98.7% Outstanding	Memory 94.2 1-Core 141 2-Core 285 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 553 8-Core 1,014 94% 784 Pts	64-Core 1,545 96% 1,545 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% MSI(1462 C727) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3570 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	110% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 139 Parallax 122 112% 133 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 133 Splatting 107 113% 144 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7,924 Write 5,236 Mixed 5,464 1,374% 6,208 MB/s	4K Read 625 4K Write 274 4K Mixed 363 1,558% 421 MB/s	DQ Read 1,485 DQ Write 994 DQ Mixed 1,080 849% 1,186 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 161GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 47 47 48 39 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 82.3 Write 73.7 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 46.2 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 76%
Kingmax USB2.0 FlashDisk 32GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 20GB free, PID 3257 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 11 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	9.05% Terrible	Read 37.5 Write 4.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 11.5 16% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.05% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IRX2666D464L16S/8G 2x8GB 2,100 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.2% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 12.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 14.4 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 59.3 68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 127%

UFO

Desktop 100%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	202x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	160x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	131x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	75x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	59x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	44x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	65x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	47x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $774

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16