Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5310 31 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Memory 48.8 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 34.9 24% 34 Pts	4-Core 35.4 8-Core 36.7 5% 36.1 Pts	64-Core 31.1 2% 31.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8094) 2GB CLim: 600 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 4.67 Reflection 3.77 Parallax 6.66 4% 5.03 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 2.96 3% 3.76 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 177 101 68 69 70 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.5% Below average	Read 207 Write 152 Mixed 143 SusWrite 109 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 19.4 76% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 22.9 DQ Write 43.2 DQ Mixed 26.8 22% 31 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.39% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 3.1 8% 2.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 3.3 8% 2.8 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.39% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon L54201stBench 45%, 65 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.73GHz1stBench 33%, 70 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
AS350 120GBApacerBench 61%, 2,135 samples	1x
SDEZS25-240G-Z01 240GBBench 43%, 706 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	1x
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16