Asus P5QL PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P5QL PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '20 at 17:01
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 5,111 User benchmarks, average bench 48% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 63.4 1-Core 31.4 2-Core 56.4 35% 50.4 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 159 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 8A9B) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Lighting 23.3 Reflection 17.6 Parallax 21.3 19% 20.7 fps	MRender 26.4 Gravity 24.1 Splatting 17.5 18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB 12,305 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 54 65 67 69 69 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 198 Write 30.5 Mixed 76.8 SusWrite 63.6 20% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 25 73% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28 DQ Write 61.5 DQ Mixed 37.2 30% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 105%
WD WD3000JD-00KLB0 300GB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 247GB free Firmware: 08.05J08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 61 60 61 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 59.8 Mixed 42 SusWrite 57.4 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 34%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 91GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 68 67 69 70 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	41% Average	Read 77.5 Write 53.8 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 65.1 45% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 54%
Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB-$70 1,727 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 48GB free Firmware: 3.42 SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 10.8 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 11 15% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 32%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 126GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 89.5 Write 60.5 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 3 32% 44.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 54%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 3,818 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 50GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 8.3 9.8 11 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	8% Terrible	Read 33 Write 18.5 Mixed 13.8 SusWrite 8.7 22% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.6 75% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	43x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	28x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	13x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	132x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	44x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16