Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '20 at 12:12
Run Duration	334 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$295 50,265 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Memory 88.1 1-Core 152 2-Core 235 90% 158 Pts	4-Core 573 8-Core 958 93% 765 Pts	64-Core 1,388 86% 1,388 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.38 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 184 Parallax 163 125% 167 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 166 Splatting 119 109% 135 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1109 868 859 864 863 857 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	300% Outstanding	Read 2,592 Write 2,338 Mixed 1,512 SusWrite 903 410% 1,836 MB/s	4K Read 63.8 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 85.5 281% 96.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,399 DQ Write 1,017 DQ Mixed 1,159 879% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 300% Great: 355%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 277GB free Firmware: UG5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 2.9 26 201 230 218 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 447 Write 355 Mixed 242 SusWrite 173 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 19.1 75% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 83.1 DQ Mixed 46.6 49% 82.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 61%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 60.9 Write 65 Mixed 51.2 44% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 59.7 Write 60.8 Mixed 33.9 38% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 190GB free Firmware: 0711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Read 35.1 Write 40.7 Mixed 32 SusWrite 23.4 24% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 103%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 10GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 34.1 Write 34.3 Mixed 31.7 SusWrite 36.4 47% 34.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.1 202% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 98%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 117GB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 94 97 97 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 88.4 Write 93.1 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 94.7 117% 86 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 1 334% 3.83 MB/s	DQ Read 0.7 DQ Write 5.6 DQ Mixed 1.3 237% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 95%
WDC WD20 EARS-00S8B1 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 215GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 31.2 Write 26.9 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 19.2 31% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 40%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 41GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 129 131 154 151 128 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 113 Write 123 Mixed 87.9 SusWrite 135 158% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 6.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 181 177 170 169 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 167 Write 175 Mixed 107 SusWrite 175 212% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.3 218% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 98%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 7.5TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 37 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 35.4 Write 34.8 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 36.3 47% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.1 203% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 98%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 59GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.28% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.72 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.28% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB 2,431 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.7% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.9 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,619x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,480x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,143x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	683x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	579x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	483x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	586x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	383x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 114% - Outstanding

Total price: $839

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16