Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '17 at 07:22
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 86.4
45% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 222
24% 188 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 46.6
31% 37.3 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 34.2
27% 32 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 492
Write 232
Mixed 233
70% 319 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 12.8
78% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 11.2
25% 49.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0302
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 33
Write 30.6
Mixed 31.5
24% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.34
88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
252GB free
Firmware: CC4H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 97.1
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.34
91% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 114%
HITACHI 500GB 500GB
162GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.4% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 33.3
Mixed 33.9
44% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.26
42% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $580
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback