Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 171 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 327 44% 330 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Asus(1043 0462) 1GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	8.7% Terrible	Lighting 10.7 Reflection 13 Parallax 14.4 9% 12.7 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 10.8 Splatting 9.3 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.7% Great: 9%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 294 Write 14.1 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 19.5 21% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 29.3 4K Mixed 31.5 97% 29.3 MB/s	DQ Read 32.1 DQ Write 29.3 DQ Mixed 42.9 29% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	61.1% Good	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 20.3 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	375x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	255x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	182x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	37x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $405

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16