Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SOC-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z97X-SOC
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-SOC-CF  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150421
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 18:02
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 210
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 442
49% 388 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 60
Parallax 88.7
54% 71.7 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 45.9
48% 59.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY SSD2SC240G1CS1754D117-820 240GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS111101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 342
Write 244
Mixed 2.5
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 35.7
126% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 172
155% 235 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 87%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
75GB free
Firmware: MKAOAAM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 81.2
Write 80
Mixed 47.5
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
520GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 171 168 176 171 174 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 132
Write 114
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 170
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
1TB free
Firmware: CC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.7
Write 60
Mixed 44.3
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$64
14GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 108 117 116 106 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 114
Write 78.8
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 109
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 113%
ST932042 3AS 320GB
28GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61
Write 66.5
Mixed 43.8
73% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 34%
FUJITSU MHY2120BH 120GB
17GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 32
Write 23.7
Mixed 20.5
31% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB
22GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20.5
Write 21
Mixed 18.2
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 66%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB
658GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18
Write 18.5
Mixed 16.3
23% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 40%
Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 3TB
0GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 12
Write 17.8
Mixed 13.5
19% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 48%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-26A23T0 320GB
27GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 43.7
Write 28
Mixed 26.5
39% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
ST6000NM 0024-1HT17Z 6TB
19GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 27 16 19 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.64% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 21.8
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 17.7
26% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.64%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB
84GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 1.2 0.4 0.7 0.6 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 52.8
Write 52.2
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 2.4
42% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97X-SOC-CF Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-SOC-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $480
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback