Asrock Z87 Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z87 Killer (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '17 at 07:48
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 196 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 387 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2677 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 368.39 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 149 Reflection 160 Parallax 150 122% 153 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 142 Splatting 117 103% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-00000 256GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 217GB free Firmware: EXT4100Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 47 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 73 (B1) Unknown 99 99 99 (B3) Unknown 100 100 100 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 31 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 668804991 (F2) Unknown 99 99 36805707956	84.6% Excellent	Read 498 Write 252 Mixed 335 80% 362 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 17.7 126% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 343 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 38.8 99% 211 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 90%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8254 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1384 (B1) Unknown 95 95 57 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 59 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 139 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20811217058	86.4% Excellent	Read 461 Write 319 Mixed 338 83% 373 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 23 124% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 218 DQ Mixed 62.9 104% 203 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 108%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 870GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 174 6258 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2831 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8111 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1391 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 111 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 167 167 99699 (C2) HDA temperature 132 113 18 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	80.9% Excellent	Read 136 Write 146 Mixed 134 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.29 107% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 83%
Asrock 3TB+ Unlocker 802GB 302 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 354GB free Firmware: 1.00 Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	45.7% Average	Read 81.6 Write 77.2 Mixed 75 59% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.27 103% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 28,220 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 14.1 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z87 Killer Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Killer - $216

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	102x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	96x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	43x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	26x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	23x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $51Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	15x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $446

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16