Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 93.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 202 78% 133 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 388 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.55% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 3 Parallax 1.2 3% 2.5 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 4 Splatting 2.2 2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,333 Write 4,646 Mixed 5,106 1,122% 5,028 MB/s	4K Read 323 4K Write 242 4K Mixed 52.1 684% 206 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 891 DQ Mixed 995 644% 726 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA MK5065GSX 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 365GB free, PID 0718 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	6.99% Terrible	Read 31.1 Write 4.8 Mixed 8.6 SusWrite 5.2 13% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.99% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 6,862 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 19.9 MC Mixed 17.2 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	Latency 60.3 66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16