Lenovo 7052A9G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 7052A9G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140610
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateMay 19 '21 at 23:36
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 169
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 332
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 8400) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 475 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.08% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 1.5
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 4
4% 5.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.08%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 81 101 104 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 85.3
Write 95.7
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 90.1
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
186GB free
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 93.9
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
192% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63
572GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 92 95 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 93.1
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 91.1
53% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 57%
ST925031 1CS 250GB
87GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 15 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.11% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 21.4
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 15.6
25% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.11%
Great: 16%
WD 812AS External 160GB
97GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.5% Very poor
Read 29
Write 14
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 15.7
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 12%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
8GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 3.8 4.6 4.5 3.5 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.36% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 2.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3.8
6% 5.72 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.36%
Great: 9%
WDC WD50 00BEVT-22A0RT0 500GB
207GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.1 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Read 27.9
Write 4.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 5.1
12% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7052A9G Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 7052A9G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $250
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback