PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-MX USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121009 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 07 '21 at 18:47 |
Run Duration | 268 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.2%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
|
1.21%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 203 329 231 125 MB/s
|
||||
General UDisk 32GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.1 2 2.8 MB/s
|
2.43%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ramaxel RMB4GB58BCA3-13HC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 69x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 68x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 51x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 40x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $325 |