Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 21 '21 at 12:37
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$47 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 61.8 2-Core 116 52% 83.8 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 295 33% 258 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% PNY(196E 0973) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.36% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 11.9 Parallax 13.6 8% 11.6 fps	MRender 13.9 Gravity 12.1 Splatting 10.8 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.36% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB 12,047 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 592GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 310 293 335 305 346 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 377 Write 249 Mixed 291 SusWrite 304 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 29.1 99% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 41 DQ Mixed 97.9 88% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 122%
Sandisk S3 512G 512GB 10,855 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 263GB free Firmware: 4010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 317 307 335 303 344 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 442 Write 357 Mixed 291 SusWrite 313 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 15.9 4K Mixed 20 79% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 23.4 DQ Mixed 43.7 59% 115 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 119%
Samsung HD155UI 1.5TB 1,454 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 319GB free Firmware: 1AQ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 37 30 30 28 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 71.7 Write 93.3 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 34.1 45% 60.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 256GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 76 86 104 91 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 109 Write 108 Mixed 66 SusWrite 92.1 69% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 69%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 128GB 752 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 77GB free, PID fa05 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.5 3.4 2.6 3.8 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.17% Terrible	Read 31.5 Write 29.8 Mixed 29 SusWrite 3.6 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 24% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.17% Great: 52%
Seagate Desktop 2TB 3,779 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 221GB free, PID 3300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5 4.8 5.2 4.8 5.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 28.2 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 4.9 28% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 19%
WD My_Passport_0810 1TB 554GB free, PID 0810 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 102 92 103 90 102 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.2% Average	Read 102 Write 108 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 96.8 123% 91.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 100% 1.13 MB/s

Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB 952 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1.5TB free, PID ab34 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.4 4.1 4.6 4 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 173 Write 11.5 Mixed 17 SusWrite 4.2 42% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 13% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 78%
WD easystore 2647 5TB 3,858 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1TB free, PID 2647 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 95 105 92 105 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 105 Write 102 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 98.9 123% 92 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.8 221% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 66%
Maxtor OneTouch 2TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2TB free, PID 7310 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.1 4.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.17% Terrible	Read 29.8 Write 25 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 4.3 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 8.17% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IMT41GU6MFR8C-RA0 2x8GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.4% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 7.6 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16