Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120419
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '17 at 19:09
Run Duration	430 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 62.4 2-Core 125 56% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 375 38% 305 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.4% Average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 51.7 Parallax 42.3 40% 47.8 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 60.2 Splatting 54 50% 61.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9342 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 699 (B1) Unknown 97 97 52 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 51 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 40 (F1) Unknown 99 99 50866459801	52.4% Above average	Read 287 Write 266 Mixed 257 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 17.9 75% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 54.5 DQ Mixed 18.7 21% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 134%
AMD 2X2 Mirror/RAID1 4TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 144% 424GB free Firmware: 1.10 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 115 Mixed 130 112% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.28 67% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 207%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 364GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 156 6716 (04) Start/Stop count 72 72 28925 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 55 55 33135 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2287 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 55 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 28921 (C2) HDA temperature 120 78 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 26 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42% Average	Read 73.5 Write 72.8 Mixed 19.5 40% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.35 94% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 51%
JMicron 1TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 396GB free, PID 2578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 60.7 Write 65.6 Mixed 56.7 79% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 0.65 4K Mixed 0.16 30% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 75%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 2,476 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 4100 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	5.36% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 2.95 Mixed 4.17 9% 10.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.09 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.006 19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.36% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 14.5 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 12.1 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16