Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory15.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateSep 06 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$220
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 314
103% 188 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 1,050
101% 834 Pts
64-Core 1600
99% 1600 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 68.4
57% 70.9 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 71
Splatting 67.6
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 49 44 35 36 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 491
Write 120
Mixed 109
SusWrite 45.8
41% 191 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 25.2
119% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 55.7
81% 160 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 79%
Intel X25-M 160GB
20GB free
Firmware: 2CV102HA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 102 74 67 61 53 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 253
Write 107
Mixed 133
SusWrite 77.4
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 11.7
80% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 155
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 86.2
74% 110 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
11GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 464
Mixed 350
97% 435 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 52.4
177% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 343
261% 352 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Adata S596 Turbo 128GB
18GB free
Firmware: 110512
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 188 166 138 167 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 238
Write 84.7
Mixed 158
SusWrite 169
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 20.3
72% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 43.9
DQ Write 50.7
DQ Mixed 25.3
25% 40 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
206GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 92 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 139
Write 144
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 91.8
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-32A160U 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 29.8
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 29.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 68: 8R 5G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
68% 48% 54 348 289 144 24" 1920 1080 ACI24E1 VG248
Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,115
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback