HP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2ADE
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130123
Uptime27.7 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 14:49
Run Duration373 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 119
61% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 228
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 2ADE) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.39% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.39%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$16
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 55 69 53 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 7
Write 16.1
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 45.2
15% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
542GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 31
Write 24.1
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 10.8
28% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 11%
Great: 60%
BUFFALO External HDD 500GB
152GB free, PID 0105
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 20.2
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 10.6
27% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB
605GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 24
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 10.7
28% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
544GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 24.6
Mixed 23
SusWrite 10.6
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 2% 66 19 15 60 21.6" 1536 864 GSM56FE W2243
History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B
Typical Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 4300 SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback