Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 1,265 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 77 2-Core 154 56% 98.6 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 560 52% 433 Pts	64-Core 1,199 74% 1,199 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Lighting 13.6 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 19.6 11% 17.3 fps	MRender 22 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 15.6 15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7WD480 480GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 327GB free Firmware: 203Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 441 440 440 434 438 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 370 Write 452 Mixed 339 SusWrite 439 90% 400 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 80.6 4K Mixed 42.1 143% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 292 234% 328 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 94%
Hitachi HUS724040ALS640 4TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 85GB free Firmware: A280 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 89.4 Write 35.7 Mixed 41 SusWrite 36 37% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 96%
LSI Logical Volume 8TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2.5TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 288 282 283 279 282 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUC109030CSS600 300GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 107 110 124 128 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 76.3 Write 108 Mixed 75.1 SusWrite 119 70% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.4 264% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C-PB HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Samsung M393B1K70... 64GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 61.7 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 43.9 132% 46.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.7 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	170x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16