Asrock X79 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory38.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '17 at 07:13
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 165
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 374
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
Nvidia(10DE 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.9
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 4.27
Parallax 3.47
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 3.97
Splatting 2.78
3% 4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.6% Above average
Read 263
Write 256
Mixed 201
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 14
80% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 34.1
59% 117 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 89%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
627GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 133
Write 117
Mixed 94.1
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.14
68% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 83%
WD My Passport 0740 500GB
240GB free, PID 0740
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 27.2
Mixed 22.7
34% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.16
51% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 36%
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 8GB
4GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 33.2
Write 3.86
Mixed 8.48
14% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.81
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 1.13
100% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 31
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme6 - $341

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $931
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback