Fujitsu ESPRIMO_D756

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO_D756  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3431-A1
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '22 at 16:35
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 207
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 180
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
PNY(196E 0828) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 6
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.3
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 115 6.8 129 131 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 461
Write 295
Mixed 331
SusWrite 126
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 30.9
4K Mixed 18.5
58% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 44.8
47% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
251GB free
Firmware: A7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 21 22 24 22 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
31% Below average
Read 87
Write 22.8
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 20.9
27% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31%
Great: 58%
WD WD10EURS-630AB1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 105 105 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 99.7
Write 99.6
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 104
72% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
WL1000GSA6454G 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 130 131 129 131 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 136
Write 127
Mixed 80
SusWrite 129
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 85%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
97GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 166 162 165 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 109
Write 109
Mixed 71
SusWrite 164
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 104%
ST350083 0AS 500GB
59GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 16.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 4.4
26% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 19%
HDS72804 0PLAT20 40GB
4GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 35 34 34 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 31.3
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 33.4
42% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 23.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO_D756 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO_D756

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $67
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback