PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell PowerEdge T20 |
Motherboard | Dell PowerEdge T20 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160707 |
Uptime | 9.5 Days |
Run Date | Jun 12 '22 at 11:18 |
Run Duration | 220 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 88% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v3-$170
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 40 105 25 123 46 MB/s
|
20.2%
Poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
84GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 126 141 166 169 157 MB/s
|
82%
Excellent
|
|||
Generic Storage Device 0GB
119GB free, PID 1336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
8.48%
Terrible
|
|||
WD My Book Duo 0A10 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 114 111 112 118 115 MB/s
|
51.2%
Above average
|
|||
WD My Book Duo 0A10 3TB
20GB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 113 110 111 118 114 MB/s
|
48.3%
Average
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
534GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
|
19.7%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG HM641JI 640GB
179GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 38 37 38 38 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend TS1GLK72V6H 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E3-1225 v3Intel $170Bench 69%, 4,850 samples | 176x |
Pentium G3220Intel $36Bench 48%, 19,337 samples | 13x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples | 52x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $260 |