HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	HP Z400 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory	5 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '22 at 07:42
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3565 7,121 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 163 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 328 44% 328 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 83EA) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.83 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 0.2 1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S130-90GB 90GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: BS 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 15 7.1 29 6.9 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.3% Very poor	Read 73 Write 82.5 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 20.7 13% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 7.9 35% 11.9 MB/s	DQ Read 10.1 DQ Write 18.6 DQ Mixed 12.6 10% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 62%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB 8,287 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 67GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 16 9.9 30 7.6 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 50.3 Mixed 38 SusWrite 21.7 30% 40.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-CK0 42GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.8% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 9.5 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

CPU
Xeon W3520Intel $230Bench 63%, 6,508 samples	569x
Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples	535x
Xeon W3565IntelBench 67%, 7,121 samples	488x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	273x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	156x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	137x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	136x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	73x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	66x

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16