| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20170217 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 14 '17 at 14:06 |
| Run Duration | 82 Seconds |
| Run User | CHL-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63%
Good
|
66% 119 Pts
|
55% 458 Pts
|
66% 1,069 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.4%
Average
|
49% 61.5 fps
|
51% 63.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba HG6 256GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JURA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
96.2%
Outstanding
|
106% 475 MB/s
|
119% 41.1 MB/s
|
101% 160 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.1%
Below average
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
35% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,529 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 417x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 326x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 204x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 215x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 194x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 189x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $847 |