PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H81M-C (all builds) |
Memory | 7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140821 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 29 '23 at 08:40 |
Run Duration | 158 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 38% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
|
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 57 10 49 47 47 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
172GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 116 122 68 67 MB/s
|
54.9%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25
72GB free
Firmware: WT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
|
32.6%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
9GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 136 135 137 138 138 MB/s
|
78.8%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 1302 PSD38G16002 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 460x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 296x |
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 223x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 300x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 201x |
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 172x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $294 |