Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '17 at 15:18
Run Duration	406 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 66.8 2-Core 107 55% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 200 8-Core 292 31% 246 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% EVGA(3842 1365) 1GB CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 11% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1843 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2174 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 1 (AD) Unknown 100 100 75 (AE) Unknown 100 100 55 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 250 (E8) Unknown 96 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 500 (F1) Unknown 100 100 11475689622 (F2) Unknown 100 100 28986626270	34% Below average	Read 477 Write 75.5 Mixed 111 47% 221 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 8.24 4K Mixed 4.3 33% 9.18 MB/s	DQ Read 35.9 DQ Write 8.09 DQ Mixed 5.19 8% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 56%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 830GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 173 168 4341 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3889 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2199 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1961 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 41 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3847 (C2) HDA temperature 122 110 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	84% Excellent	Read 155 Write 138 Mixed 135 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.24 108% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 86%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 945GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 181 178 5916 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2939 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3620 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2188 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 64 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 88527 (C2) HDA temperature 122 108 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.5% Good	Read 112 Write 98.5 Mixed 85.1 74% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.22 91% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 63%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65 22,230 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 47GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 104134499 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5589 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 39253686 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2366 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2205 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 49 437518358 (C2) HDA temperature 22 51 51539607574 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 20 19 104134499 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -21483426405630 (F1) Unknown 100 253 4161841419 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1442619072	68.5% Good	Read 130 Write 109 Mixed 89.8 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.58 110% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 65%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 300GB free, PID 0400 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 102 Write 110 Mixed 65.4 117% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 6.06 4K Mixed 0.39 221% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 0GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 7101 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Read 7.77 Write 5.94 Mixed 6.72 8% 6.81 MB/s	4K Read 2.62 4K Write 0.13 4K Mixed 0.12 18% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	41.2% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 14.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.1 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16