Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170828
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '17 at 03:00
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 137 2-Core 269 93% 166 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 835 79% 652 Pts	64-Core 1,078 67% 1,078 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3717) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 145 Parallax 124 111% 135 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 133 Splatting 105 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 279GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10625 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 204 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 59 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 13 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5659495429	111% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 404 Mixed 416 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 44.8 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 44.2 173% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 115 133% 229 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 27338 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1338 (B1) Unknown 85 85 174 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 52 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 29 (EB) Unknown 99 99 90 (F1) Unknown 99 99 55702496576	61.6% Good	Read 262 Write 172 Mixed 181 45% 205 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 20.9 115% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 72 77% 129 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 118%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 60GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 173 5541 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8679 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 36 36 46921 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1845 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 127 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 2491453 (C2) HDA temperature 123 98 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	30.3% Below average	Read 55.9 Write 49.8 Mixed 47.8 38% 51.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.23 64% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 55%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 16GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 10GB free, PID 0307 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 42.4 Write 41.1 Mixed 33.7 50% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.84 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.58 150% 3.21 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192 40,358 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 36.2 MC Mixed 27.8 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 39.5 SC Mixed 32.2 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 94%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 86%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $179Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,711x
Core i5-8600KIntel $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	841x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	173x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	398x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	337x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	230x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $91Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	146x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	128x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	126x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	219x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	148x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $44Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	113x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $763

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16