Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150505
Uptime7 Days
Run DateAug 28 '18 at 13:37
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 64
2-Core 96.4
48% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 178
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.3% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 33.8
24% 31.5 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 34.7
26% 30.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Galax TA1D0120A 120GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 44.7
Write 147
Mixed 16.7
16% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 16.4
62% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 45
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 111
69% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 80%
Seagate ST3500641AS 500GB-$83
219GB free
Firmware: 3.AGM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 47.2
Write 30
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 41.9
29% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 12.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback