HP Pavilion P6000 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion P6000 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A92
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100907
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '18 at 02:11
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.1% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 37.2
2-Core 68.2
39% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 92.4
8-Core 133
14% 113 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
PwrHis(1787 2288) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 6
12% 8.61 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 11.3
Splatting 6.91
8% 9.51 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 112 109 151 171 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 172
Write 115
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 131
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87%
Great: 112%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
689GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 119 124 124 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 132
Write 126
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 123
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
242GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 98 99 99 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 97
Write 100
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 98.1
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD1339.M16F CT51264BD1339.M16F CT51264BD1339.M16F CT51264BD1339.M16F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion P6000 Series Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion P6000 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback