Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory61.4 GB free of 16.0029 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 14 '18 at 08:46
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
None, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 155
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 578
53% 444 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 446
Write 332
Mixed 420
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 28.6
83% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 262
196% 260 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 78%
Virtual HD 241GB
208GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 367 430 424 430 429 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 356
Write 507
Mixed 352
SusWrite 417
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 15.3
50% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 258
188% 245 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 85%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
999GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 35 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 112GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 32767, 32767, 15363 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.4% Above average
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 21.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback