Asrock H61M-VG3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG3  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 07:28
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3210-$70
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 83
2-Core 127
61% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 206
24% 188 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 3104) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.9
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 17.2
0% 11.1 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 17
Splatting 17
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 160GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.9 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Read 6.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 3.5
4% 5.95 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.3
320% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 39%
Virtual Disk 893GB
208GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.4 4.9 4.3 4 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Read 7.8
Write 6.8
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 4.3
5% 6.68 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.5
262% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 7
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $83
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback