Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	14.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 50.1 2-Core 101 52% 79.4 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 201 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 202 12% 202 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 0356) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.59% Terrible	Lighting 8.33 Reflection 9.04 Parallax 5.87 7% 7.75 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 4.67 Splatting 8.65 6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.59% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual Disk 80GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 71.6 Write 79.4 Mixed 64.9 16% 72 MB/s	4K Read 7.11 4K Write 8.75 4K Mixed 3.94 20% 6.6 MB/s	DQ Read 7.19 DQ Write 7.74 DQ Mixed 2.69 3% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 23%
Virtual Disk 893GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 121GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	45% Average	Read 85.4 Write 68.9 Mixed 81.4 59% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.12 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 0.5 283% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.83 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.9 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	20x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	18x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $378