Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
9 years ago, 9 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X48-DS4  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '14 at 02:48
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 111
39% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 231
31% 231 Pts
64-Core 227
14% 227 Pts
Poor: 36% Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4475
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 73
Parallax 66.1
60% 70.8 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 59.6
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
545GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance (0th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 240
Write 374
Mixed 175
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 8.91
4K Mixed 0.64
6% 3.38 MB/s
DQ Read 2.54
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 1.02
3% 5.78 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 445%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 163
Write 315
Mixed 120
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 8.24
4K Mixed 0.38
6% 3.05 MB/s
DQ Read 2.14
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 0.92
3% 6.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 118%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
34GB free
Firmware: CXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58% Above average
Read 255
Write 243
Mixed 254
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 22
88% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 93.1
DQ Mixed 65
67% 113 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58%
Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
3.5TB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 143
Write 150
Mixed 119
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 5.34
4K Mixed 0.81
220% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 94%
Typical GA-X48-DS4 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback