Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '16 at 16:33
Run Duration379 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 625
62% 504 Pts
64-Core 786
49% 786 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3966) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4752
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Lighting 50.8
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 42.1
41% 46.7 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 38.8
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 138
Write 135
Mixed 115
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.13
37% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 100%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 143
Write 116
Mixed 100
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.26
61% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 145
Write 135
Mixed 77.1
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.12
4K Write 2.86
4K Mixed 0.38
142% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 112
Write 93.4
Mixed 56.7
65% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.07
4K Write 2.67
4K Mixed 0.37
135% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 135
Write 117
Mixed 20.6
66% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.05
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.36
128% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 85%
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 26
Mixed 26.4
34% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 2.66
4K Mixed 0.36
107% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 61%
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.6% Very poor
Read 29
Write 25.9
Mixed 26.9
35% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 0.37
110% 1.32 MB/s
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.1% Very poor
Read 29
Write 25.7
Mixed 27.1
35% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.37
94% 1.18 MB/s
WDC WD20 03FZEX-00Z4SA0 2TB
45GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 25.5
Mixed 25.6
34% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.84
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.34
93% 1.16 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB-$115
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 22
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback